Gautam Kandlikar

January 12, 2011

The-River

Filed under: Books,Life — Gilbert Keith @ 12:49 am

My walk around campus retrieved a memory of this awesome part of Hesse’s Siddhartha. It’s in Chapter 11 of the book.

When he had finished talking, Vasudeva turned his friendly eyes, which had grown slightly weak, at him, said nothing, let his silent love and cheerfulness, understanding and knowledge, shine at him. He took Siddhartha’s hand, led him to the seat by the bank, sat down with him, smiled at the river.

“You’ve heard it laugh,” he said. “But you haven’t heard everything. Let’s listen, you’ll hear more.”

They listened. Softly sounded the river, singing in many voices. Siddhartha looked into the water, and images appeared to him in the moving water: his father appeared, lonely, mourning for his son; he himself appeared, lonely, he also being tied with the bondage of yearning to his distant son; his son appeared, lonely as well, the boy, greedily rushing along the burning course of his young wishes, each one heading for his goal, each one obsessed by the goal, each one suffering. The river sang with a voice of suffering, longingly it sang, longingly, it flowed towards its goal, lamentingly its voice sang.

“Do you hear?” Vasudeva’s mute gaze asked. Siddhartha nodded.

“Listen better!” Vasudeva whispered.

Siddhartha made an effort to listen better. The image of his father, his own image, the image of his son merged, Kamala’s image also appeared and was dispersed, and the image of Govinda, and other images, and they merged with each other, turned all into the river, headed all, being the river, for the goal, longing, desiring, suffering, and the river’s voice sounded full of yearning, full of burning woe, full of unsatisfiable desire. For the goal, the river was heading, Siddhartha saw it hurrying, the river, which consisted of him and his loved ones and of all people, he had ever seen, all of these waves and waters were hurrying, suffering, towards goals, many goals, the waterfall, the lake, the rapids, the sea, and all goals were reached, and every goal was followed by a new one, and the water turned into vapour and rose to the sky, turned into rain and poured down from the sky, turned into a source, a stream, a river, headed forward once again, flowed on once again. But the longing voice had changed. It still resounded, full of suffering, searching, but other voices joined it, voices of joy and of suffering, good and bad voices, laughing and sad ones, a hundred voices, a thousand voices.

Siddhartha listened. He was now nothing but a listener, completely concentrated on listening, completely empty, he felt, that he had now finished learning to listen. Often before, he had heard all this, these many voices in the river, today it sounded new. Already, he could no longer tell the many voices apart, not the happy ones from the weeping ones, not the ones of children from those of men, they all belonged together, the lamentation of yearning and the laughter of the knowledgeable one, the scream of rage and the moaning of the dying ones, everything was one, everything was intertwined and connected, entangled a thousand times. And everything together, all voices, all goals, all yearning, all suffering, all pleasure, all that was good and evil, all of this together was the world. All of it together was the flow of events, was the music of life. And when Siddhartha was listening attentively to this river, this song of a thousand voices, when he neither listened to the suffering nor the laughter, when he did not tie his soul to any particular voice and submerged his self into it, but when he heard them all, perceived the whole, the oneness, then the great song of the thousand voices consisted of a single word, which was Om: the perfection.

I haven’t heard the river so deeply, but it has definitely added some meaning to my life in the last few years. I’m glad it’s there, and I think it’s high time I start doing more to conserve it.

–Gautam

November 9, 2010

O, reason not the need

Filed under: Books,College Anxiety,Interests,Random — Gilbert Keith @ 10:56 pm
Tags: , , ,

I am somehow churning out a paper on the following monologue from King Lear (Act 2 Scene 4) at a decent clip.

O, reason not the need: our basest beggars
Are in the poorest thing superfluous:
Allow not nature more than nature needs,
Man’s life’s as cheap as beast’s: thou art a lady;
If only to go warm were gorgeous,
Why, nature needs not what thou gorgeous wear’st,
Which scarcely keeps thee warm. But, for true need,–
You heavens, give me that patience, patience I need!
You see me here, you gods, a poor old man,
As full of grief as age; wretched in both!
If it be you that stir these daughters’ hearts
Against their father, fool me not so much
To bear it tamely; touch me with noble anger,
And let not women’s weapons, water-drops,
Stain my man’s cheeks! No, you unnatural hags,
I will have such revenges on you both,
That all the world shall–I will do such things,–
What they are, yet I know not: but they shall be
The terrors of the earth. You think I’ll weep
No, I’ll not weep:
I have full cause of weeping; but this heart
Shall break into a hundred thousand flaws,
Or ere I’ll weep. O fool, I shall go mad!

August 2, 2007

Obscured by Clouds, and book X

Filed under: Books,Summer '07 — Gilbert Keith @ 7:12 pm

So, Chinese fireworks got pwned yesterday due to smoke that wouldn’t budge. In fact, there was so much smoke that you couldn’t see the “impressive” display unless it was extremely high. That said, we went to downtown Vancouver yesterday. There are so many 30-floor skyscrapers that it’s not funny. The skyline looks horizontal rather than jagged. Furthermore, I toured around the UBC campus and the area is pretty amazing. There are snow-capped mountains across the bay, and the rose-garden is just fantastic. I am going to the Vancouver Museum and the maritime museum today. That should be fun.

About the secret book I am reading, it’s very hilarious and sad. That’s all I will say.

April 30, 2007

Cooking + The Idiot

Filed under: Books,Spanish — Gilbert Keith @ 3:42 pm

Tenemos que cocinar para un proyecto. Vamos a cocinar las enchiladas y algo que no puedo recorder. Creo que el proyecto es loco, y no quiero trabajar mucho… :( vi la proyecto de Anu hoy, y ellos hicieron un video muy serio.

In other news, I started reading The Idiot by Dostoevsky. Apparently, it is natural for everybody to go through a Russian/Cyrillic phase, so I don’t feel left out. :-p  The book is very well written, or very well translated – probably both – and I am liking the narrative already.

Gonzalo.

April 9, 2007

Dan Brown?

Filed under: Books,Opinions,School — Gilbert Keith @ 9:34 pm

I think people need to re-evaluate what qualifies as literature. Seriously. In Raths’ class 7 people (out of about 30) said they would recommend he read Dan Brown books. In Humanities,  about 12 out of 33 students read either Angels and Demons or The DaVinci Code for the outside reading project.

I wonder whether you people have read ANYTHING other than Dan Brown (note: reading material must be intellectually stimulating by my standards). Do you know any author other than Dan Brown? Are you seriously recommending RATHS read it? Don’t tell me you like all his works or that he’s a good author. I can tell a good author from a bad author and he certainly isn’t one. A good author might win a Pulitzer Prize for his work; heck, he might win a Nobel also. I don’t see Dan Brown claiming ANY of those awards. NONE EVER. I call his books crap because:
A. There is no elegance in his works.
B. The character development is extremely superficial (if at all there is any).
C. The plots, which most people consider Brown is good at, aren’t interesting AT ALL. There is a difference between an interesting plot and a “confusing plot which seems good because it invokes historical and intellectual”. There is also a significant difference between an interesting plot and one which renders the book a mere page-turner.
D. Those works are extremely fantastic and they appeal to, er, slow audiences who don’t realize the fantasy. DON’T YOU REALIZE BOOKS ABOUT HISTORY ARE FOUND IN THE NON-FICTION SECTION IN BARNES AND NOBLES????>>?>?>???//>?

Apparently, the teachers chose to include these books among the list of potential candidate books for the outside reading project because the discussion of artworks is very pertinent to the course material taught in the class. EXCUSE ME? How did The Three Musketeers fit that category?? It was written in the Romantic era and clearly discussed Romantic ideals. The baroque period  (which lasted for two centuries) is yet to be covered in the class. Furthermore, I didn’t see any discussion to art or sculpture in my book.

Another interesting thing I saw is that some people were uncomfortable with the books because they disliked how Christianity was looked upon. First, I reiterate that all that junk is made up, so there is absolutely no reason to be uncomfortable. Second, it seems pathetic of you to be uncomfortable of such stuff only when it concerns some Everyman like yourself. Why don’t you just read about Alexander Borgia and his incestuous affairs and then talk about how uncomfortable it makes you? Please?

Last, but not the least, let me invoke the influential Stephen Colbert (Thanks to Michael for the inspiration).

It would take a million monkeys typing on typewriters for an eternity to write the complete works of William Shakespeare.
It would take 10, 000 monkeys 10, 000 years of typing to produce a Hemingway… but you’d have to get them drunk first.
It would take 10 monkeys typing for one 3-day weekend to produce a Dan Brown. Actually, no typewriters are needed. They’ll just smear it on the wall.

Gautam

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.